Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2008, 02:57 AM
sixtiesmuscle sixtiesmuscle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago suburb
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default '67 Camaro specs

Does anyone have ,or, know where to find accurate weight, length, width & wheelbase numbers for a '67 Camaro. Thanks
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 04-28-2008, 03:33 AM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,874
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,448 Times in 1,406 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro specs

Here's what I found in the 1967 Chevrolet Salesmans Album:
Width-72.5"
Height-51.0"
Length-184.6"
Wheelbase-108.0"
Curb Weight-*
*2,910 lbs for the 6-cylinder coupe
*3,070 lbs for the 8-cylinder coupe
*3,165 lbs for the 6-cylinder convertible
*3,325 lbs for the 8-cylinder convertible

Then add:
+21 lbs for power windows
+20 lbs for the folding rear seat option
+86 lbs for air conditioning
+9 lbs for power brakes
+33 lbs for front disc brakes
+10 lbs for the 250ci 6-cylinder engine
+39 lbs for the 327ci V8 engine
+72 lbs for the 350ci V8 engine
+258 lbs for the 396ci V8 engine
+7 lbs for the four-speed manual transmission
+14 lbs for the Powerglide automatic
+56 lbs for the Turbo Hydra-Matic
+38 lbs for dual exhausts
+29 lbs for power steering
+15 lbs for heavy-duty battery
+8 lbs for an AM radio
+9 lbs for an AM-FM radio
+17 lbs for the Rally Sport option.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2008, 04:02 AM
sixtiesmuscle sixtiesmuscle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago suburb
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro specs

Thanks Rick, but, does it make sense that you would have to add 258 lbs. for a 396 over a 350? That means that my big block RS would weigh only 93 lbs. less than the advertised weight on my '68 GTO.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2008, 04:48 AM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,874
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,448 Times in 1,406 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro specs

I read that as only adding 186 lbs. more for a 396cid over a 350cid,but I understand what you're saying Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2008, 04:53 AM
sixtiesmuscle sixtiesmuscle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago suburb
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro specs

Thanks. Math isn't my strong suit, but, the numbers still don't make any sense to me. I appreciate the help Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:50 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 15,964
Thanks: 483
Thanked 4,708 Times in 1,209 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro specs

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks Rick, but, does it make sense that you would have to add 258 lbs. for a 396 over a 350? That means that my big block RS would weigh only 93 lbs. less than the advertised weight on my '68 GTO.

[/ QUOTE ]

What RS big block ?????
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.