Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
03-10-2008, 10:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Goodmark V.S. NOS 70-73 Camaro Quarters
There are seasoned body guys on here who can tell the difference, but is there a weight difference - Goodmark have the doorjamb area? School me please - thanks in advance.
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork. 
|
|
#2
03-11-2008, 08:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Goodmark V.S. NOS 70-73 Camaro Quarters
If you have a chance to buy GM quarters at a reasonable price buy them!!. A talented bodyguy can install the offshore stuff & make it look nice with a lot of work. I don't know if metal is thinner or not. From experience the extra money spent on NOS panel is money well spent because you will pay your bodyguy a lot of labor to make the offshore ones fit. A full NOS quarter can be installed in 12-15 hours start to finish.
|
|
#3
03-11-2008, 09:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Goodmark V.S. NOS 70-73 Camaro Quarters
The Goodmark 1/4s arent too bad. The front fenders take more work to fit well.
__________________
TheMuscleCarGuys.com
|
|
#4
03-11-2008, 11:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Goodmark V.S. NOS 70-73 Camaro Quarters
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork.
|
|
#5
03-17-2008, 09:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Goodmark V.S. NOS 70-73 Camaro Quarters
But according to an article in Popular hot rodding the classic industries parts are Quote " they were probably as good as it was from GM when the cars were new"
 And some mention of perfect fit on other parts LOL
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
