William,
So by posting the link it appears you do not have an opinion yourself?
OK then Help me to understand - lets try to agree on some basics applicable ONLY to 1967 Camaro production: (Please Agree or disagree)
1. In 1967 The TT (Trim Tag) contained the major options on each body built at Fisher Agree?
2. 1968 and 1969 TT's were configured in a different manner from 1967. Agree?
3. The 1967 TT contains the option and basic RPO idenity of each car. Agree?
4. The 1967 TT was affixed by Fisher during the build up of the body. Agree?
5. In the absence of a body with a TT at the Factory there is no car to go to Chevrolet final Assembly (CFA). Agree?
6. The CFA side of the Fisher "hole" was called "Final Vehicle Assembly" Agree?
7. The basic Option content on the body was created prior to the assignment of the VIN# on the Chevrolet side. Agree?
8.The VIN# and the computer lock for CFA (with the specific option content) was partially assigned based upon down line parts availability. Agree?
9. The order where the bodys were staged at the Chevrolet side of the Fisher hole consisted of multiple staging lines. Agree?
10 The order that the bodies were staged on the Chevrolet side was random prior to the assignment of the VIN and final assembly computer build lock. Agree?
11. The VIN# assignment was required to lock the Body into final vehicle assembly sequence to meet the required parts pick. Agree?
12. The Trim Tag identifies the Month and week of body build up. Agree?
13. The build up of a body is part of the assembly process of building a complete car. Agree?
14. Fisher Body and the construction of a body was an overall Part of the GM/Chevrolet Assembly Process.
Agree?
Not trying to be adversarial, just trying to understand why you have the opinions that you seem to have on this specific vehicle in this thread.
Thanks for your time. We will start here.
