Sorry quicky, I can't agree. I can only agree with the Clinton comparison. I know everyone wants to get the most for their car, but that description demands disclosure of a nom motor and non-original fender tags.
"Car is 3 Fender Tag car" we don't know if it is or not!
That wording, to me, implies that it came that way.
As a buyer i would rather get a good and true full description of the car. Facts like it has a good and correct date coded motor. Eventually a buyer will see the attempt at "deception by omission" and will now doubt the whole car and probably walk.
I am from the camp of put the whole ball of wax out there, not semantic games.
that said, i hope the car does well. Its a very nice real, NOM, made up fender tag with great un documented options and a great looking resto 71 hemicuda.
knowing the truth, you can't read that description and not feel a little violated.
just my opinion,
Respectfully,
John
