[ QUOTE ]
MIdas.........Who cares if the guy is a Judge or a Waiter..........It's a matter of "Right" and "Wrong".......Don't you Get it.....
There are two actions at stake here....The Libel ( Tough to Resolve).....and the Actions of the Seller after the Sale............Why are you Blaming B-J........Were they the ones that Breached the Sales Contract........Remember......After the Gavel is dropped....the car has a New Owner......How would you feel if you had bought the car and this guy comes over and decides that even though you bought the car thru a Legal Venue, that he didn't want you to have it put the chains thru the rims (scratching them) and padlocked everything......what if the next guy decides to sabotage the engine or whatever because they are "UnHappy" with the Results.........Where does it end????
B-J is doing what they have to do........Don't you understand that.........Again.......what if "You" had bought that car
[/ QUOTE ]
Kwizz, I get it just fine. I see your point, and though I don't like B-J, I think you have to look below the surface on this one, as where there's smoke, there's usually some sort of fire.
It would be untrue if I didn't think the chance for B-J to make even more money has corrupted them, but that's not the point. The fact of the matter is that the words "fraud" and "auction" are being used in the same sentences as B-J, and bringing suit will be even more damaging, regardless if they win or lose, as it puts these words out there with B-J in the same sentence even further.
My points are that a judge presumably knows the boundaries of the law, and if you've read any of the background in this case, B-J bringing a case against anyone is a bad move.
Some interesting reading for you:
http://www.classiccar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8767