[Seattle Sam]

[ QUOTE ]
But if he did and Tom's car is "Car 1" as he puts it..no door..how can that be..Wouldn't his first Car have the door like the 1967 car, which I don't think is in dispute? Why go from "door" (1967) to "no door" (TC's car), then back to "door" (Car 2 in Tom's hypothesis the burgundy car)???

[/ QUOTE ]

Greg,
The terms Car 1 and Car 2 were used to easily identify one car from the other, not to indicate which one was built first.

Greg, I don't know you and I have stayed out of this until now, but it becomes increasingly more clear with each of your posts that you are NOT trying to be objective and research a car, instead you are trying to discredit Tom's car as a DH car.

If you in fact think that you are neutral on the matter, I urge you to go back and re-read all of your posts, why have you taken it on your shoulders to question this so closely? What's in it for you?

I believe Tom has gone above and beyond where he "needed" to go to present why he believes his car is a DH car, and I for one believe him. You can't get away from the point that folks who were there have validated this car when it didn't make any difference to them one way or the other. Now that some of these same people have a dog in the hunt, they suddenly change their stories.

Greg, as Mr. Neutral, why don't you call them to task for changing their stories? Their motives should be clear to you from reading their web postings, why are you in support of them? Why, instead, are you challenging the integrity of the family who clearly has done far more than anyone to promote and preserve all these supercars?

I'm personally insulted by your insinuations and innuendos against the Clary's, you have stepped way over the line here.