I guess I write this both alittle PO'd and alittle in awe with this whole topic. You guys have demonstrate at least to me you could care less about serious research and the "truth" whatever path it takes with this car...

This car was bought as THE DH car, it will always be THE DH car, not because research or serious study said it is...but because some guy wrote on a piece of paper it is and someone bought it that way and happens to be your buddy and the owner of this website..and you guys think that is enough and that warrants a 100% definitve statement that it is THE 1968 DH funnycar..no matter what credible evidence there might be out there casting doubt..So it really never matters as it is THE 1968 DH car..just because it is


I wonder if by your post and your attitudes about seriosu research you thought far enough to see the potential ramifcations... You guys just opened up a qaugmire with respect to ANY Chevrolet "supercar" where a VIN isn't known to be historical fact..everything really except ZL1's....your COPO's, SSL78's, Z's as now all it takes is a "it must be one because I bought it that way" or "someone said it was" and as long as it looks relatively close to what that particular car should how can you say it isn't...After all if you will validate with 100% certainity such a historical piece as the DH FC with the same info and no real research then a relatively common Z or a COPO is a piece of cake...You guys did it now live with it..