[MosportGreen66]

[ QUOTE ]
To be fair, I offered up many suggestions as to why it was different. I was looking for any cool stories about how it was changed, not going on a witchhunt. Geez, relax guys.

But, if this were NOT owned by a member of this site would the differences have been overlooked as they were in this case? Or, would we have gone on for 75 pages looking for answers? Not trying to stir anything up, but just asking what I believe to be a valid question.

[/ QUOTE ]

Phil... I think you bring up valid points and questions. In this particular case however, the authentication of the car has been proved here so some of the skepticism that arose is not needed. If a car is posted here and is very much in question, all the owner should do is provide documents or other forms of authentications.

I do not think there are major issues with a car's paint (even as rare as this where the paint really makes the auto). Paint can always be changed. It is not as hard to find a talented painter as it would be to track down an original motor from a car. I do not think the paint issues with this car were overlooked. I just don't do not believe they were discussed. This is a radical piece of Motion Performance History!

-Dan

I did not intend for original reply to be nasty or agressive in anyway.