[yountto]

Belair, Ok then,i will make it short..I have a problem with cars that have "joes a good guy", "Tim judged it",and "BOB put gas in it in 1977" as "documenting" a car.Its done more on this site than ANYWHERE else.Probably because theres not alot of documentation available on these cars like buildsheets etc..The "supercars" are usually mentioned because thats what this site is about more than any other car .I dont specifically have ANY problem with copos [and im currently in the market for one],other than i wouldnt own one that wasnt canada documented[my personal preference]unless it was priced as a well done clone[again my personal preference]. ...After watching the Ebay ls6 gain momentum in acceptability because of the ebay bidding list and one persons opinion,i brought up the fact that now that there were members here bidding on it,everyone jumped on the "its an original car" bandwagon,when for the last year it was for sale not nary a word was said.I guess now that the car went elsewhere we can talk about how worthless the ls6s are again.....Can you imagine how many more 435 67 corvettes would be made"legitimate" if the NCRS started "documenting" cars based on a judges opinion and a Zora Duntov signed glove box??]?????? Simply put,you cant campaign a car as 100% legit UNLESS you have factory legitimate paperwork or in the case of the ZL1s,the vin #,and that will always be the universal litmus test...On another note ..On dreamcar garage, in between the "yenko chevelles and camaros are 150k and novas 300k",didnt i hear an "although not as desirable as an Ls6 convertible" in that sentence correct me if i am wrong