View Single Post
  #14  
Old 02-11-2003, 02:13 PM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,097
Thanks: 720
Thanked 360 Times in 144 Posts
Default Re: '69 L89 Nova's ??

Jim;
You can't use the CTB/CTC engine code duplicity in an effort to correllate the 311 L89's produced to include Camaros and Novas. The CTB/CTC Camaro Z28 engine codes being used on the Novas was specifically due to the Novas being COPO's, the L89 option was an RPO, obviously not the same.

Does anyone know where the 311 produced comes from? Is it engines produced, or cars produced? If it's engines produced, then Jim may have a case provided the engines produced don't have any applications stamped into them. However, if they did, then we would have the breakdown for Camaro vs. Nova vs. Chevelle applications.

I think the only drivetrain code that was duplicated between the Camaro's and Novas were the rear axle codes, BT indicates 3.55 Posi for both '69 Camaros and Novas for eg.
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote