I really think the car is (Kind of accurately) represented from a legal prospective for the auction.
Car was sold new at Baldwin Chevy.
Car was likely converted at a much later date by motion as a job in the early 1970’s
So the car is also Motion conversion.
So it is accurate to call it a Baldwin/Motion that is kind of factual.
The unanswered questions center around the absence of any record of the car being an actual Baldwin-Motion performance combine product and in addition there are no records of a later motion conversion on this specific car either.
|