View Single Post
  #5  
Old 02-23-2021, 05:31 PM
Tracker1's Avatar
Tracker1 Tracker1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ONTARIO
Posts: 3,367
Thanks: 924
Thanked 989 Times in 471 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCreekDave View Post
One of Ford's minor mistakes I think when they stayed with the 302 in 70 instead of going with the 351 in the Boss Mustang. Would have loved to see that engine in the earlier body.
Agreed, but SCCA Trans Am wanted them for the 5.0L homologation rules blah, blah, blah

But Mopar had the right idea to do a de-stroke of the 340, thus keeping the extra inches for the AAR/TA street versions. Not sure why Ford didn't do the same. Can a 351 Cleveland be de-stroked to a 5.0L engine? With 1969 technology considered of course?
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork.
Reply With Quote