View Single Post
  #6  
Old 06-26-2019, 12:31 PM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,559
Thanks: 383
Thanked 390 Times in 167 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
L89 was not an engine option. It was an aluminum cylinder head option that required ordering the L78 engine. Factory docs for those cars always list both. The L78 total includes the 311 L89 cars.

LM1s are not COPOs, it was an RPO. Not rare, 10,406 built in the 4 months of availability. It was odd in that it required an optional transmission; the MC1 HD 3-speed was the cheapest at $79 and was dropped as an option at the same time.
I was aware that both are RPO's, I was wondering where they fit in the production numbers you gave. Ie, the L89's bundled with the L78, along with the COPO's if I understand you correctly.

The LM1' were bundled where? In the L65 (350),L48 (ss) or L30 (327)?

Just trying to follow the thought process.

Thanks,

/R
__________________
Rich Pern
69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier"

Last edited by 69LM1; 06-26-2019 at 12:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 69LM1 For This Useful Post:
Z-11 396 (06-26-2019)