Re: 1969 Z28 Crossram Camaro
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dannystarr</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I sent this info on this car to a friend, as he was REALLY interested. JUST what he was looking for, color and all. He began getting funds together to possibly make an offer. Then 53 hours and change later, in <span style="font-weight: bold">ANOTHER</span> auction, all of a sudden the block [TO THIS CAR} MIGHT not be the matching numbers block original. I am confused. WHY wasn't this mentioned in the original 51 word description?? WHY did it take someone asking questions at another section of this site to get this info? I just wrote a 6 <span style="font-weight: bold">THOUSAND</span> word description with over 350 pictures and video's. I am tired of these vague 30 second descriptions. What a shame, my buddy in LA is very saddened by this updated info. And if it cannot be verified, that is a 20 to 25K hit right. That's what I was taught on these Camaro sites. So should I expect a new price any day now of 60 to 65K?.. Danny </div></div>
Not sure why you are on this rant. He said in the other thread they apparently can't find a vin stamp to confirm ? I don't see where he is misleading anyone. I see things are are not right but I might know Camaro's better than him. I have owned Z28's that I'm sure there was no vin but was the orig. engine. I like the fact that he didn't stamp the vin. It would be very easy to stamp a very common impossible to read vin down in that area and nobody would be able to tell. No need to trash or say the car is worth 25K less. As with any car you or your friend should do their own inspection. Does it have anything like a protecto plate that would match the stamping on the engine pad ? Can we all please not nitpick every item we see on a car ? This is what will keep people from posting on this site.
__________________
......
|