<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Vortecpro</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stefano</div><div class="ubbcode-body">As someone who builds engines on a regular basis, those are extremely impressive numbers on an engine dyno. However, engine Dynos are not very comparable from one brand or set up to another.
I have seen engine Dynos vary as much as 20%
An engine with the specs you posted would dominate various "class" racing venues.
I am curious as to the racing applications your engines have been used and your results against the competition.
Again, very impressive numbers!
</div></div>
Its always interesting when people start talking about dyno numbers. Myself I've never seen Super Flow dyno FWHP numbers vary much at all when the same corrections (STP) are being applied and the dyno is "calibrated" and the right inputs are being used. And to back up my opinions on here: 3 different times, my engines tested on my own Super Flow 901 with the TQ system checked and verified by Harold Bettes were shipped to: Reher Morrisson, Owens in Houston, and Westec in California, Super Flow sent their own people to calibrate Westecs dyno prior to my test, the results......less than 1 percent HP on the dyno's calibrated by Super Flow, Reher Morrison was high by 2 percent. Real back to back testing.
http://www.chevelles.com/forums/13-p...ech-today.html </div></div>
Mark to be honest my own engine, before I bought it had quite the difference from this dyno to Steve Schmit's. Made about 7% more on Steve's dyno then here. This dyno has been considered fairly close when went from here, to s certain, well know SuperStock dyno. A couple percent changes over the 3.