View Single Post
  #10  
Old 05-16-2015, 01:14 PM
iluv69s iluv69s is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 2,511
Thanks: 69
Thanked 324 Times in 137 Posts
Default Re: 1967 muncie trans question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MosportGreen66</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I agree with Charlie. I bet its original. I looked at a '69 Z with the engine build date within 1 week from engine assembly date to the car's final assembly date. I found it so hard to believe only because the supply chains of the 1960s were hardly just in time or lean. Ironically the car had a beautiful stamp. Nonetheless the car proved to be 100% legitimate. Same applies here... </div></div>

I think there are documented blocks that are date assembly stamped the next day after casting date... ( if my memory serves me)...where is Kurt when you need him...haha..???

..and I had a 69 RS Z Van Nuys car that had a BB and M-20 when I bought it... I never realized it was the original trans. til I put a clutch in it and found the VIN on top of the muncie... I never thought they put M20s in the Z's until then either... !! Boy was I happy because that helped document the car as a real Z also !!
Reply With Quote