[Lynn]

The sol on possession of stolen property has not run. He is still in possession, and had reason to believe it was stolen when he bought it with no title.

Just need to know two things: Did the original owner report it as stolen? Seems academic, but if it isn't on the national list, he has a problem.

Secondly, did he collect insurance money? If so, he has no right to the car. I am guessing he did not if the original story is accurate, as it plainly states he has the title in his possession. Had he accepted the insurance proceeds, he would have surrendered the title to the insurer who now has the best claim to the vehicle.