Re: 1969 Copo ?
I don't think the sellers were being deceitful either. They were just repeating things they had read and been told. I didn't have to be sarcastic when I made some earlier posts, but what irked me is that a lot of guys here are so well meaning, genuinely helpful and dag gone knowledgeable, and a car like this generates a ton of interest, no doubt, that everyone chiming in was not always careful to state as Sgt. Friday would say,"just the facts,mam." This led to an ad on the ebay that was easy to discredit. Worst is, the sellers praised this site, and while not intentional, gave the site a black eye possibly by making us seem wrong in our facts, which is why the sellers got involve with sYc in the first place was to "get it right." Had I not been on here for awhile, if one read what was stated and drew a conclusion that they must have learned what is stated off that site and those guys must not know anything. Mr. Lilliard and others have worked hard to make it not only a fun group of car guys(gals), but a group with credible knowledge. So, when I saw statements that easily be discredited, I got a little honked off and sarcastic. Like most , if not all, here, I too have seen it all...think I said that in 1st post.
__________________

69 SS/RS 396 M20 X22 Nor 12B,72B,712 bought 1979
FULL OWNER HISTORY
69 Dick Harrell tribute Day II 427 M20 4.10 X11 76 orig pnt, 711
67 Super Stock 302 Camaro re-creation
|