[69LM1]

Granted Lynn. I'd also like to know more about what the Dad knew and when.

However, that does not justify the moral position of the OP taking parts he knows he did not purchase and basically saying too bad for the dad/kid.

If he was going to offer the dad/son 10k, why didn't he start off talking to them as the officer suggested? By the OP's own words the officer who inspected the car stated that the father/son invested thousands of dollars into the car (again if the Dad knew it was stolen that's a different story) and suggested that the OP and Dad try and work something fair out.

That's what should have morally happened IMO.

Instead the OP stated that he had no interest in working anything out, he just wanted the car back as is, based on the law. He also stated he was getting the upgrades on the car and the father/son would have to go after the seller.

Now all of a sudden he was going to offer 10k to the father and son? Sorry, I don't think I believe him based on what he said here.

I'd also like to know more on how the father/son bought the car............ Maybe that guy will start a thread over at Camaros.org or something [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/smile.gif[/img]

Rich