[69LM1]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 70 copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Under Georgia Law the father of the kid is considered the thief, and based upon his previous posts on other sites- He knew back in July that issues were emerging with the car.

I feel for the kid too, but failure and tough lessions will teach things you need to know in life. This is one of those lessons. </div></div>

Perhaps I missed something then. If the second &quot;victim&quot; knew the car was hot then yes, I have no interest in defending him.

I understood that he didn't know the car was hot, just that he was having trouble getting it titled. If he knew it was stolen then I agree he should get nothing.

Rich