Thread: Motion Nova????
View Single Post
  #26  
Old 10-26-2012, 12:27 PM
motionwannabe motionwannabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PENNSYLVANIA USA
Posts: 337
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Motion Nova????

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Charley Lillard</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Dan has a car with no paperwork or proof so what is there to prove ? You want someone to prove it is a fake ? The community is keeping him from enjoying his car ? How ? He can build it and enjoy it as is but instead he has been trying to unload it. We have to certify his car why ? So he can unload it for more ? I'm glad he found it and maybe some day some paperwork will pop up but until it does I don't see why you feel the community needs to jump thru hoops trying to find a needle in a haystack to help Dan sell his car. Has he gotten Notarized letters from anyone that says they remember the car ? Anything like that ? We don't know because he is misleading in his ad. He says in his ad he has a letter from Joel. That infers it is documented by Joel but apparently it is a maybe letter. Don't you think that was misleading in his ad ? You want us to jump thru hoops for someone that is purposefully misleading us in his ad ? I'm sure Dan has done more research and turned over more rocks looking for proof than most of us could. I think if any of us had info that would shed light on his car we would be glad to help. Anyone else with different motives but had proof would have already bought it from Dan. Make sense ? </div></div>
Charley, I agree with what you are saying and it makes sense. I didnt mean to make it sound like I think people should jump through hoops for Dan. All I'm trying to say is, I don't understand why, but Dan has stood behind this car under mass scrutiny for some reason. He has taken more verbal abuse than anyone else over a car that may be or may not be real. He sent me an email of the letter from Joel and it is vague at best. His ad is misleading and does imply that he has a letter of documentation and would most definitely lead someone to think that Joel gave it his blessing, when in fact he basically said &quot;I do not know&quot;. Theres a bunch of other drama over this car reguarding phone calls from collectors,so on and so forth that Dan has gone through. All I'm trying to say is for the cars sake it would be nice to have this all put to bed. It has gone on for so long. Dan says he has an NICB report for the car. I never looked at that. I'm not trying to make anyone mad nor do I want to be in the middle of some crazed dispute like in the past. I would just like to know what the car is or isn't and if someone buys it I hope they try to figure it out. As far as what I said about &quot;keeping Dan from enjoying his car&quot; what I meant was all the scrutiny and &quot;fog&quot; around it when he brings it up, How could anyone enjoy it with so much drama.If I were him, and the car was in fact beyond a shadow of a doubt real, theres no way after all the bs I could enjoy it. Does that make sense?? Maybe Dan should put it together and give it a good beating just because. Maybe, If Dan wants to, he can send one of us a pic of his letter from Joel (both pages) and we could post if for everyone to see. For me, I couldn't care how much money he gets out of that car one way or another and I'm not asking anyone to help him for monetary gain. All I meant was just to prove one way or another what the car is. I do agree if the provenance was there this car would be in someone elses collection.
Reply With Quote