View Single Post
  #55  
Old 10-01-2009, 05:34 PM
flyingn's Avatar
flyingn flyingn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cinnaminson , NJ
Posts: 2,178
Thanks: 5,949
Thanked 648 Times in 260 Posts
Default Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu

You cannot be serious? You would rather lose your life then to cut your knee? wow.


[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
In a front end impact would you rather be in the 59 or the 09?




[/ QUOTE ] very easy answer the 59 for me all the way
When I worked at DHL whe had a lot of Ford E 250 Vans with a full frame NO air bags and those things were tanks
I have had more then one van that was hit and van's hitting other cars and the van allway's won
once had a vw jetta blow a red light and the driver t boned the guy The vw broke in two killed the driver of the vw The van I replaced the head light pulled the bumper out and sent him on the way
I know what they are trying to say that unbody air bags crumble zone ect is supost to be safer but I have seen way to many accidents and I am just not buying in to this and the same for the video I am not buy it
And my wife would not be here today if she was in that cavalier when she was hit That 1970 tank saved her no air bag no crumble zone just a big tank

[/ QUOTE ]
__________________
Frank Szymkowski

1987 Mustang GT convertible, scarlet red/titanium, white top and white/red leather, 5 speed, 3.08, factory EQ

1969 GTO Judge Warwick blue/blue, RAIII, 4 speed, tach/gauges, safe t track, flip headlights, 3.55's, ps and radio.
Reply With Quote