[ QUOTE ]
I have purchased several cars from Mark Young. All were represented for exactly what they were. It is obvious that L88 owner and CamaroNOS have some type of personal vendetta against Mark. It is a shame they they do not have the guts to look Mark in the eye and resolve. Most of us are tired of hearing this slander. Mark works his tail off, takes risks few on this board would ever dream of taking, accurately represents what he sells, and has to put up with annonyomous keyboard jockeys envious of his success slandering his good name. That sucks!
[/ QUOTE ]
These risks………….well……………..
I cannot vouch for Mike Young down in Portland, just seen his name around and wanted to reiterate what had been posted other places.
So, I have no issues with Mike, just wanted to inform what others have posted here.
BTW, do your two cars have original trim tags too?
Z16 #24
http://www.chevelles.com/forums/arch.../t-251663.html
"Also, for kicks I worked through the trim tag decode on chevellestuff.com. Maybe that guy can help solve the mystery "U" code on option group 4. Didn't Z16 have a one-off rear drum brake that was larger diameter or something like that? Maybe that's it, it is attributed to 65 only, so it would be fitting.. The front suspension and the rearend was different. Basically they were full size Chevrolet parts adapted by GM to a Chevelle (not a simple bolt on).
Also, the VIN stamp on the block all crooked like that, is that normal? According to nastyz28.com decoder, that IX suffix is a '67 only deal. Seems like that engine may be fishy.Engine may be fishy but IX is the correct suffix for a 65 Z16. I have seen known original engines with stamps that looked as bad or worse than that one. I would need a better picture and more information before I would make a judgment; better yet a personal inspection."
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/show...0/fpart/1/vc/1