Original stamping?
 

Hope I can get an opinion as to whether or not the following item on ebay, a muncie item# 230215310614 is a restamp or not. Thank you

Re: Original stamping?
 

That transmission is September of 1969, making it a 1970 transmission, not an early 1969 as listed. The stamp on that case is P9P10 P= Muncie, 9=1969, P= September, 10= 10th. Here is a 69 stamp comparison from a Camaro Muncie that I recently sold. I don't know why that transmission listed isn't stamped "C" for M22, as it should being a 1970 trans.
https://www.yenko.net/attachments/313499-39a1_1.jpg

Re: Original stamping?
 

P9P10 Muncie build decodes as...

P---Muncie assembly plant
9---1969 model year
P---Sept.
10--10th day of Sept.
This is an early build trans, Sept. 10th of 1968 for use in a 1969 model year car...
It has no A-B-C ratio designator because that didn't start until the end of Sept. 1968 calendar year, a little more than a month later... Hope this helps... Crash

Re: Original stamping?
 

That's a common decoding mistake with Muncies. As Crash said, the number after the "P" is model year of the car and not the calendar year of the trans assembly.

Re: Original stamping?
 

Thanks for the additional information about this trans stamping. Would any of you venture an opinion as to whether the stamping is original or is it a restamp?

Re: Original stamping?
 

Looks original to me.

Re: Original stamping?
 

Looks original to me too... Crash

Re: Original stamping?
 

so i can understand this, how is the P in this stamping SEPT
P---Muncie assembly plant
9---1969 model year
P---Sept.
10--10th day of Sept.

Re: Original stamping?
 

[ QUOTE ]
so i can understand this, how is the P in this stamping SEPT

[/ QUOTE ]

Its just how they were done:

http://www.camaros.org/drivetrain.sh...missionNumbers

Re: Original stamping?
 

Thanks to all who responded to my questions. Always nice to have more information to work with and see if a person is on the right track or not.