![]() |
68 B-M Chevelle article
|
Re: 68 B-M Chevelle article
1 Attachment(s)
Both exterior shots are of the El Camino. The magazine editors probably just used GM P.R. photos for the article.
|
Re: 68 B-M Chevelle article
Better links easier to read
|
Re: 68 B-M Chevelle article
Unreal indeed. I wonder why the Nova was not listed? Did they do the transplants only when the 396 came out first on the 68, which was mid-year, right?
My dream is to be able to go for a ride in a L-88 equiped car. Boy did Mr Motion put out some wild tickets back in the day. So I take it no elcamino was ever found to be converted by motion, bummer. I love these articles, keep them coming please https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/laugh.gif |
Re: 68 B-M Chevelle article
I does not suprise me that there are none around. Because they are so light in the rear, El Caminos do not hook up near as well as a sedan or Hardtop would and with that kind of horsepower. Therfore every little bit of traction would be precious. Most caminos back then had a wheel hop problem.
|
Re: 68 B-M Chevelle article
1 Attachment(s)
Traction---- Country Style---even got butter at the end of a 1/4mi run ----https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...ns/burnout.gif
|
Re: 68 B-M Chevelle article
That is just what it takes to get traction in a camino. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...s/headbang.gif https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/haha.gif
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.