![]() |
may have a rare motor
Hello all,
I’m trying to sort out an engine that I believe may be COPO or Baldwin-Motion related. Some numbers line up, but others don’t, and I’d appreciate the community’s input. Car VIN: 136379G339916 (1969 Chevelle Malibu V8, Framingham, MA) Block: 3963512 (cast March 1969) Pad Stamp: T0325JD (Tonawanda, March 25, 1969 → decodes as L78 396/375hp, 4-spd) Heads: 3919840, date A38 (Jan 3, 1968) Partial VIN: Present on block, faint but matches car VIN Owner History: Motor sat in a basement for ~20 years. Previous owner claimed it was a 396, but machine shop told him it was a 427. I bought it ~25 years ago and ran it in a ’71 Chevelle. Specs (as given to me): 425 hp before rebuild 11:1 compression, TRW pistons Forged steel rods, 4-bolt main Square-port “840” heads Questions/Confusion: Block suffix “JD” = 396/375hp, but casting is 512 (could be 396/427/454). Heads are correct HP 427 pieces, but dated a year earlier than block. VIN shows Framingham assembly, while COPO Chevelles are often Baltimore/Kansas City. Car is based out of Long Island, ~30 minutes from Baldwin Chevrolet. What I’d like to know: Is it possible this is a COPO 427 block restamped as a 396 L78? Could Baldwin-Motion have built it (without paperwork)? What else should I check (casting, etc.) to confirm? Any insights, corrections, or leads on documentation would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Benny |
Can you throw up a few pics of the pad and the casting number/casting date of the block?
Paul |
I’m guessing it’s exactly what you believe it is - a 4.25” bore block restamped as a 375hp 396.
|
Where did the car sell new from
|
|
1 Attachment(s)
Heres a pic of the engine pad stamping from that thread
|
Guess he didnt like what he heard over there. Pad looks like a restamp.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.