Very Nice '72 Z/28, #s 350/4-sp, 42k miles
 

This one should do very well - will be interesting to watch.

It's odd that the trim tag wasn't painted during the restoration - I think I would go back and correct that. All in all, nice car...not a 100 point car, but definitely nicer that what I would consider driver quality.

That gang stamp operator in Norwood must have been having a rough day when he was stamping the partial VIN on that transmission....

Link to 1972 Z/28 auction

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/cmIAA...1M/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LIUAA...3f/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/4tIAA...6P/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/AzwAA...7R/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/VtgAA...8V/s-l1600.jpg

1QS7L2N148557

https://www.kloompy.com/cars/1972-ch...28-5-7l_i23601

VIN is wrong on eBay this time around 1Q87L2N148557

Car will need some fine tuning to fix the non- original items....
Wrong tach, Rear spoiler should have a foil decal, and it’s missing rear bumperettes

Don't like what I see around the rear subframe shot.

There's what I call "alot of littles" on this one.

So is the finish on the brake booster supposed to have that much gold tint to it? The original on my 69 has more of a silver cast, and I have an original second gen booster that was apparently a counter part from back in the 70's never installed on a car that also has a lot more silver in it.

Replacement booster.