![]() |
Real or not real BE rear
1 Attachment(s)
Is this a known date or to early
|
1 Attachment(s)
Another picture
|
J 1 8 date?
Regardless it’s not the date I have and with that casting date I feel good about saying no it’s not legit. But I’ve been wrong more than once today.. Seems like I have a BL with that date though.. I need to look and see. |
rear end
almost looks like a F was stamped over a L if you look close, but its just my opinion
|
The E looks too elongated.
The never made a BF rear,so looks like a messed with BL 3.07 open. |
The earliest known real BE axles are dated mid November '68. Re-stamp.
Just for the record, there was a BE 12 bolt axle in '68, a 2.56 open. |
BE rear..
Fugazy :cool2:
|
There are 1968 BE rears that are multi leaf 12 bolts. I had one, its a 2.56 open 12 bolt. This could be a real BE but not the one you want.
|
I don't know anything about stamps, but that E doesn't look right to me.
|
IF this was a real BE (2.56) and being it would have been made for a 68 then the casting date would not have been J-1-8... Which means this would be an early 69. 69 2.56 ratio would be a BA (non posi) or BB (posi). The likelihood it was a warranty replacement would be slim also.. Please someone correct me if I am out of line in my way of thinking. Or open it up and see what guts it has. But I still think its a modified BL.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.