![]() |
2,888 original mile camaro
Check out this 2,888 original mile camaro.maybe this will help someone with there restoration,there are a lot of good pictures. Look at the date on the frame, I have never seen that before. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/cool.gif
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
[ QUOTE ]
Check out this 2,888 original mile camaro.maybe this will help someone with there restoration,there are a lot of good pictures. Look at the date on the frame, I have never seen that before. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/cool.gif [/ QUOTE ] Link please |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Wow - that is a special car! Color is way cool. Although the engine bay looks quite nice now - don't agree with their choice to restore it as the original condition is now lost https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/dunno.gif . I understand the urge, but considering the unique low mileage car that this is they shld have held off. Enjoy seeing the correct markings and other flaws that are missing in most restorations today. Were these chrome valve covers optional/available for 68? Thot they would be painted same as engine block. Would be happy to have this puppy in my stable to be sure https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/laugh.gif .
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
The thing I like about it is the picture of the rear right spring area. If you look at above and to the left of the spot welds holding the valance and the innter panel together you will see #s. Stamped from the inside out those #s are the id #s that are on the build sheet for that car. Nobody mentions putting the rear spoiler on it.
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
[ QUOTE ]
Check out this 2,888 original mile camaro.maybe this will help someone with there restoration,there are a lot of good pictures. Look at the date on the frame, I have never seen that before. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/cool.gif [/ QUOTE ] I have only seen this once and I thought it was fake??? I could be wrong?? Here are some pictures.. Mark http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y29...8/Dcp01110.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y29...8/Dcp01109.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y29...8/Dcp01092.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y29...8/Dcp01085.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y29...8/Dcp01081.jpg |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
I love that color. My dad had a 68Z the same color. I've been trying to locate it for some time but keep coming up empty. Last known location was in Richmond, and the car was black.
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
[ QUOTE ]
The thing I like about it is the picture of the rear right spring area. If you look at above and to the left of the spot welds holding the valance and the innter panel together you will see #s. Stamped from the inside out those #s are the id #s that are on the build sheet for that car. Nobody mentions putting the rear spoiler on it. [/ QUOTE ] I never noticed that stamping before so I went out and looked at my car and sure enough there it is. They must relate to the sheetmetal build week like the markings in the corners of the quarters and in the deck lid. Wow, learn something every day. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...iggthumpup.gif Rick H. |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
[ QUOTE ]
Were these chrome valve covers optional/available for 68? Thot they would be painted same as engine block. [/ QUOTE ] Yes,they are correct for the SS 350 and the 302 Z along with the Vette. These are a ONE year only valve cover and are very tough to find.Each cover is marked with a O between the bolt holes on the intake side mounting flange.There are two different part numbers for these covers,right and left.The 68 painted covers also have the O, but are often difficult to see due to a ton of paint.I have several sets of NOS covers and a few std. painted ones for comparison.Note: the later service parts don't seem to carry the O .......... Steve |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Rick, If you have the build sheet to your car that# will be the same as the ID# on that sheet.
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
I have only seen build sheets in LA cars.
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Kim,
No build sheet, Norwood car. The sheetmetal on my car has a lot of factory stampings. Each quarter is stamped in the corners, deck lid is stamped, fenders have stampings in them. All my springs have original tags, and like the car mentioned here I still have the tape under one subframe bushing that held it in place. The problem I see with this 68 SS is that I highly doubt it will be allowed to be judged in any unrestored class. Some of the markings and other parts look way to good to be unrestored. One other thing that I see that is missing from this beauty is some sort of ducumentation. There is no mentoned or pictures of any paperwork. You would think with that low miles and the history of this car there would be some paper work like window sticker, protect-o-plate, anything. That would really sell this car. But I got to say it is one beautiful car and the new owner should be very happy with it. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...iggthumpup.gif Rick H. |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Nice paint and interior, but not a survivor.
The engine (and components) and trans and replaced rear were restored. The subframe was restored. Steering parts (with a repainted steering box) look original, other than that the undercarriage is restored. So you're saying the body # is stamped on that rearend seam? Do you have another pic of one? Never heard of that before. Body # is 115464, which doesn't appear to match what's stamped here (?). https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/dunno.gif http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a2...e/DSCN0533.jpg |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Here is a shot of my tail panel and although I can not make it out that clearly, it doesn't seem to be the same as my body number. I still think it is a sheetmetal date code just like the quarters and fenders.
http://home.rochester.rr.com/drhoff/...tailmark01.jpg Rick H. |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Kurt the # I am talking about is on the broadcast I think it is the 2nd item listed after the production date it's under id # on the sheet.Kim
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Kurt, The car I had was a 67. Maybe they were done on 67's only??
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
I thought the SS cars got the J-52 power front disc barakes standard. Maybe that was in 69?
Paul |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Paul, the J52 pwr disc brakes were standard in 69 on all SS cars. The manual drum setup was standard in 67-68 which is not a bad system on a small block car but it ain't no fun in a big block!
Kim, I have both Body and Chassis Broadcast Copies for 67-68 Camaros and I do not see what number you are referring to. There is one that is referred to as the IDENT. NUMBER on the Chassis Broadcast and it is after the vin. Is this the one you are talking about?...........RatPack............. |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Hey RatPack... Can you email me copies (jpg or similar) of your 67 and 68 Body and Chassis pages? I'd like to add them to my "Examples" page to go along with the 69 I have.
Thanks Ed |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
I've seen a original date stamp on the frame, it was a different font and in school bus yellow though.
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
That's the one the ID#. I had a 67 RS-SS vert I found that # By accident. It was a LA car. I had two body broadcast sheets to it. The sheet was on the 2nd page of International Camaro club's magine. the March/April 1991 issue. Donna Crispino put it in there. Also the car was in the Jan/Feb 1992 issue. Kim
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Ratpack it may have been on chassis sheet not the body sheet. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
[ QUOTE ]
I still have the tape under one subframe bushing that held it in place. Rick H. [/ QUOTE ] Rick, Can You post a picture of your tape on the bushing? Thanks! Phil https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Okie Dokie, here is the tape on my never been touched original bushings.
Neat huh? Rick H. http://www.camaros.com/rick/bushing02.jpg |
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
I never knew the tail panel had that stamp. I have 2 68's an LA and a Norwood Camaro that I just looked at, and both have the stamping. I can't imagine that number tieing into the car in anyway. It has to be some sort of date code. I just changed the body bushings on the LA car and I remember pulling that piece of tape off and throwing it away. Woops. I will check the Norwood car and see if it is still there as the original bushings are still there. And Rick thanks again for the help last night with the 70 Z/28
|
Re: 2,888 original mile camaro
Bill, you're welcome. The car is question is made up of about 4 different cars. The trim tag doesn't match the car or VIN, the motor doesn't match the car, the wheels are painted later model, the interior is out of a later model 2nd gen. The body is a wreck and needs a total restoration including every panel replaced including the roof.
Rick H. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.