![]() |
CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
http://www.camaros.org/assemblyprocess.shtml
excellent reading [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggthumpup.gif[/img] |
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
It's still being edited, but feel free to comment on it. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/eek.gif[/img] Wow [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/eek.gif[/img]
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
Kurt,
That is quite an accomplishment. I'm sure most of that info took quite a but of digging and jarring of memories to get. Awesome job! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif[/img] |
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
Very interesting stuff...
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
great job [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
One very minor thing I notice is where he mentions Z/28 and Z-11 stripes. Should the Z-10 be added here? |
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
BKH:
If I read JohnZ's report correctly, the body plugs went in after primer and before lacquer. You were right, they would probably get overspray. |
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
I know this is about the 69 production year, but I have pics of a '67 body plug next to the area to be installed, behind the driver seat, the laquer outline of it is on the primer.
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
Most of the kudos go to John.
He has a great memory and good notes. And although I've spent a some time in assembly plants, he lived in them and launched many a new vehicle. That'll help imprint the details in your memory! I did catch the Z10 stripe thing, but didn't mention it. I will now. Thanks! |
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
I read the post. I agree with the body drain plugs being installed before paint. That is the way I have always seen the original cars done. I really had to prove my point at GM Carlisle and I think that some people still don't believe it was done like that. I think that most seam sealing was done before primer. If you scrape enough of the sealer off, you are always into virgin bare metal. Just an observation on my part. ..BKH
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
Kurt: I remember seeing in old assembly line photos from the plants that showed at the end of the line where there were camaro and firebirds every other one did they join together at some point or were they assembled together from the start? -Denny
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
I don't recall that picture.
They were mixed in right from the start. One of the more interesting examples of that is the Ford Wixom plant. They were making Town Cars, LS's, and Continentals, all on the same line. 2 totally different rear wheel drive platforms and a front wheel drive car. Makes mixing F-birds and Camaros look easy. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
The reason i was asking was if the Camaro and Firebirds went down the lines together the paperwork for the pontiac has been found right? in theroy the camaro paperwork cant be that far from them if the fisher body plant had the records i would think.
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
Another thing I wonder about is when the shifter was installed. In 67 and 68 it seems like it would be difficult to drop the body after shifter install. With that big curved lever sticking up you could not come down straight with the body. In 69-71 Chevy went to the round handle Hurst with the snap in handle design. This would allow shifer box to be in place before body drop then assembly person could snap in the lever from inside. 1972 and up had a no name snap in shifter. I think a ITM.
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
IF THERE IS ANY DOUBT ABOUT OVERSPRAY ON THE FLOOR PLUGS PLEASE VIEW MY 70 Z-28 THAT I HAD ON EBAY RECENTLY. EBAY ITEM # 2434039830. THANKS.... KP
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
I have seen both of these cars and the overspray is very obvious on the floor plugs. So what is the overall opinion on this topic? Do we have any other examples to view,so we can put this topic to rest? "MOF" [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
|
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
I asked John for clarification. His response was:
Shifter was in place with the linkage adjusted on the engine dress line (4-speeds) and on the chassis line for those with the crossmember-mounted shifter; the body drop at VN (or chassis "insertion" at Norwood) guys were pretty clever - that's why the hole in the floor was as big as it was. Would have been a nightmare to install the shifter and linkage and gage/adjust the linkage from below after body drop. Corvettes were body-dropped for years with their "T"-handle shifter in place and a MUCH smaller hole in the floor. John Dennis, Camaros and F-birds only mixed at LA in 68 and 69 and Norwood in late 69. Billing histories would have been kept by the divisions, not the plants. All the plant paperwork is long gone. |
Re: CRG documented 1969 Camaro assembly process
One of my three 1970 Camaros is a Survivor mostly original LA car. The LA Camaros used a Black primer on the underfloor. This Cranberry Red car has plenty of Red overspray on this Black underfloor....as well I can clearly see Red Overspray on the "Beige" colored sealer securing what appears to galvanized metal floor plugs......my .02.....Chuck S/ Seattle
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.