![]() |
LOS COPO 9561
It dosent say its a Clone or Tribute.
12A LOS CBE Rear end VIN 124379L511422 http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Ca...m=152056154140 |
Re: LOS COPO 9561
Production date on the NCRS is December 5, 1968. Axle is stamped C BE 0107G.
You be the judge. |
Re: LOS COPO 9561
|
Re: LOS COPO 9561
|
Re: LOS COPO 9561
I'm thinking that we shouldn't add that one to out registry!
|
Re: LOS COPO 9561
That seller looks familiar. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/whistle.gif[/img]
|
Re: LOS COPO 9561
.... they said it was a real copo ..... and it is sold
12A LOS CBE Rear end VIN 124379L511422 [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img] |
69 copo
Hi there, im new to the forum, was trying to do some homework on a VIN for a 69 copo and found it here. theres a pic of the VIN stamped on the block, and some talk about whether or not its authentic. would anyone be able to help me out with this? Im considering buying this car, and if theres any doubt about its authenticity I would really like to know that. Thanks so much, Brett
|
The very first L72 COPO Camaro 427 engines were assembled January 3, 1969. That's a common date, along with January 4th. Those engine dates are found in the earliest COPOs, built starting January 15, 1969 at the Norwood, Ohio plant.
The vehicle in question has an engine stamped T1120MN. That's 44 days prior to the earliest known L72 engines. It is also the only one known with that date. The car was built December 5, 1968, 41 days prior to the first COPO Camaros out of Norwood. The ducted hood that was standard equipment on all COPO Camaros did not exist in production at that time. You be the judge. Here's another thread. http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=14502.0 |
69 copo
thanks for your response. So understand I know 69 camaros decently, but not anything about the copo's, lol. So excuse my questions. So I hear and understand the date codes and build dates, but is this up for interpretation, or is it absolutely positively not real? I mean one post from someone said, I dont think we should put it in the registry. So sounds like its not considered a real copo car? i wonder how john cena bought it if it wasnt a real deal car for 175 grand? I saw something saying in 2017 from mecum it sold for 62,500. I mean how can this be? Also is the pic posted of the block and date code/VIN considered restamps? Looks to me like you can see the broching? any way someone might give me a call and discuss this more with me? it would mean the world obviously, cause I dont wanna buy a car thats not 100% legit. I thought it all checked out, but Im no expert on copos, so I needs some schoolin!! lol Thanks man
|
I am no Camaro man having been into Mopars all my life. That said if I were looking to buy a high value Camaro I would trust the voices on this board. If the validity of it is called in to question on this board I would most definitely be walking away from it.
|
Quote:
I wrote the book on the Norwood plant and interviewed the guys who were involved with the COPO programs at the beginning of production. This particular car is better described as a tribute or a recreation. I hope this helps you in understanding the car. |
William is one of the most knowledgeable people I've ever met when it comes to 69 Camaros. I would heed his advice.
It's pretty well known that the ZL2 hoods weren't even in production until very late December and that's a mandatory option on the COPO cars. The #1 ZL1 was the first to get it and that car wasn't finished until Dec 30th or so? (Correct me William, I know that's close) Just the hood dilemma would shy me away from this car despite how good the engine stamps may look. |
Quote:
|
The earliest documented [at this time] production special ducted hood build is a Z/28 at Van Nuys, on or about December 27, 1968. At Norwood, ZL1 #1 was final assembled December 30, 1968. Both cars have production broadcast copies.
The press release notifying dealers of the ZL2 option is dated November 25, 1968. Typical order lead time was 28 days. |
Quote:
|
I said it 4 years ago and I will say it again. That engine pad stamping is a restamp.
Im glad I posted that picture of it and it possibly saves someone from getting screwed. |
I've been contacted a few times about this car, most recently by Jeff L. in Colorado two weeks ago. There is nothing correct from build date, stampings, no history available and it's a VN built car and only one has been documented.
I'm not sure why we keep getting inquiries.... perhaps they don't like the obvious answer.:bs: |
Quote:
|
i am a novice..i found an L89 block and these guys shark tanked it..and the one thing i learned, it was fake, and the big indicator was the zero..and that zero looks exactly like the zero on the fake block i found..theres a def style of zero and that aint it
|
Quote:
|
"The Emperor Has No Clothes".
|
copo
That engine is a re-stamp. Wasnt there a documented VN Burnished Brown Copo? Wasnt there a VN Copo lost in a fire many years ago? Its always buyer beware on a lot of this high dollar stuff.
|
Quote:
|
I love this site. A car can look 100% perfect,but then somebody will notice that the wingnut holding the air cleaner lid is wrong.
|
Los copo 9561
Yes, I agree 100%, there are some Very Smart people here, better than any other site that I know of, but there is WAY more wrong with this car than a wing nut. Bill
|
Quote:
|
Just TRY TO Find a ZL2 hood dated late Nov 1968 or first week of December 68.
|
With all the knowledge these days of these cars, particularly 69 Camaros, it's surprising to me to still see this stuff floating around touted as the real thing.
I just got back from Goodguys this weekend and I truly think I had the only real 69Z on the entire grounds. There was one other 69Z there, nicely restored but many incorrect details. What got my attention was the claim that it was the very first prototype 69Z built serial number 500003 with this huge sign made up for display. So I had to look closer. First thing I noticed was the data plate removed with 2 holes left in the firewall. It also had a complete ZL2 hood setup on it and we all know from this discussion, the hoods didn't hit production until very late December, and Z/28's were well into production by that point in time, so a prototype couldn't possibly have it? The rear stripes were done incorrectly, console with gauges and no clock in the dash, chrome gills in the quarters but no style trim anywhere else?? Nice car, Hugger Orange with black stripes, but a Z prototype? Maybe someone here knows the car or that serial number has been tossed around here in the past? Maybe I'm wrong about it but it had a lot of red flags to make me a believer. Is there more to the story?? |
was that larry christensen's car that you were looking at? Did he not uncover and restore the z prototype? I have not seen the car, but have talked to Larry about it....same car?
|
What is believed to be the 1969 Z28 Prototype was at MCACN.
|
Quote:
I'd like to hear more of the story but at first glance, there were a lot of things off cue about it to make me believe the story. The ZL2 hood was a biggy and anytime the data tag is missing or tampered with, I'm a skeptic. |
Quote:
I know William would know more about this. I seem to remember William and I talked about a Prototype Z that the owner of D and R Classics owned at the time and was waiting for restoration. William please correct me if I'm thinking of a different car, my memory is fuzzy on the details. |
Larry bought Steves pro type Z from D&R
|
Ah okay, so maybe same car? Cool.
Hopefully William could shed some light on this then and maybe explain the oddities I was seeing that I mentioned earlier. |
Quote:
I heard Larry's car came away with an award. He also had the car at MCACN last year. |
'Pilot' cars were built on the line using mostly production parts. N500003 was an engineering car, built up out of a '68 body and some hand-fabricated parts including the instrument cluster and trunk floor. Intake manifold had a stamped casting number. Since it was never in production, there was no body tag. All bets are off; anything could have been done.
There are two photos of it in the October '68 Motor Trend. In those days, magazine lead time was about 90 days so the photos were probably taken late June '68. In both, the car has a ducted hood. Since it virtually had to have been built with panels off of production tooling, entirely possible the hood tooling was done at the same time. Hard to say for certain but in the photos it appears to have 15 x 6 wheels. I had the opportunity to examine N500003 at D & R a few years ago. Very interesting car. Engine is stamped V0615DZ; VIN hand-stamped by the oil filter. Probably done later on after it was assigned a VIN and very surprisingly sold. Those were the days! |
There was fiberglass ZL2 Hood already in 68 for the Cross Ram intake.
|
Quote:
Thanks for that William, I knew you'd be the guy to shed light on that :biggthumpup: |
From this past weekend at Goodguys Scottsdale (from the pics in the Lounge area)
Larry Christiansen's Pilot 1969 Z28 https://www.yenko.net/forum/attachme...7&d=1606014924 https://www.yenko.net/forum/attachme...8&d=1606014924 https://www.yenko.net/forum/attachme...9&d=1606014924 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.