![]() |
Re: Is "stance" important?
I like!
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: markinnaples</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That Camaro is beautiful, but with those size rear tires, that thing needs to sit up about 2" more in the rear. Really looks like it would hit the rear tires on the smallest bump. </div></div>
I concur. Gotta be inside the wheel well. My .02cents |
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
rat tuned, that Chevelle is killing it.
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Not sure how I missed this thread! Great pictures! Here is the stance I worked hard for. Quite low, but using stock 6320s and re-arched factory monos.
http://www.fototime.com/80936A783765313/standard.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
My Dad's:
Circa 1968 -- Day 2 Stance 1967 Nove SS 327/275 4 spd 4.56 running on AR Ansen Sprint Wheels w/ slicks Help me find my Dad's custom cars! Visit: http://www.bydennislarsson.com http://i361.photobucket.com/albums/o...psphfjgp6y.jpg http://i361.photobucket.com/albums/o...pshn3dnbiq.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
I know, I know....it's not "classic old muscle" like the first pic I posted of my '69 in this thread I started 570,000 views ago, BUT......today is today and "stance still matters". With the current Mopar and Mustangs prowling the streets, my new ZL1, IMO, just has that "badass stance". Merry Christmas to all you guyz!
http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r...sgzn5n6fx.jpeg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
Yes it does...!
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.