|
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: markinnaples</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That green 68 Camaro defines Day Two, love it. </div></div>
Yes it does..reminds me exactly how they were in the late 70's. |
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: whitetop</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: markinnaples</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That green 68 Camaro defines Day Two, love it. </div></div>
Yes it does..reminds me exactly how they were in the late 70's. </div></div> I agree with both statements. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img] Tommy [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/3gears.gif[/img] |
Re: Is "stance" important?
Here she is in her "War Paint" after Bob sold it in 1974. It stayed this way till 1985 when I had it painted all Daytona Yellow shown in the 1st post of this thread.......Did I make a mistake?
http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r...ps4b6326be.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
I picked up a Crown Vic DD with only 55K on the clock for $2500US, and I noticed it did not shift right with the A/C on. Went ahead and changed out the fluid and filter twice, and it seemed just okay until 130K when third and fourth started slipping to where it needed to have some diagnostics and replacement therapy. Since I am neither a blue oval or trans guy, it only came out to where it functions. Wish I cared more, especially after the plastic intake failed. Luckily they sell entire kits with alloy manifolds for only $130US...
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ss427copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Here she is in her "War Paint" after Bob sold it in 1974. It stayed this way till 1985 when I had it painted all Daytona Yellow shown in the 1st post of this thread.......Did I make a mistake?
http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r...ps4b6326be.jpg </div></div> I do love the old school paint scheme. Enjoy it for now & when you get bored have it painted back the old school look. Looks tough both ways... |
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ss427copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Here she is in her "War Paint" after Bob sold it in 1974. It stayed this way till 1985 when I had it painted all Daytona Yellow shown in the 1st post of this thread.......Did I make a mistake?
http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r...ps4b6326be.jpg </div></div> Too COOL!!! Love it. |
Re: Is "stance" important?
Come on, we're just getting Luke Warm.....keep the pics coming [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
Dan |
Re: Is "stance" important?
Just so the Mopar fans are feeling the love.....
https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...3961-image.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Postsedan</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Come on, we're just getting Luke Warm.....keep the pics coming [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
Dan </div></div> I concur Dan. Trying to hit 10,000 views. Come on folks, show us those different stances. |
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
[quote=69 Post Sedan]Okay....here's a couple of different looks from the blue bomber!
Kurt https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...9-100_4458.jpg bingo! |
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
A little different approach [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...psff7b9703.jpg Tommy [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/3gears.gif[/img] |
Re: Is "stance" important?
Hey Tommy, we could make a Moon pie delivery truck outta that.
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
That would make a great mural wouldnt it!! Mmmmmm, moonpies [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
Tommy [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/3gears.gif[/img] |
Re: Is "stance" important?
1 Attachment(s)
The wheels and tires are key.
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Stance of another type. At 170 mph, the stance stays the same........low and faaaassssstttt. God I loved driving this car.
http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r...c/100_0443.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
1969 must have been a great year, of course I was conceived that year, but there must be more pics of 69 chevelles and camaros on this thread than any other car or year.
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ss427copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This one I kick myself in the ass every time I think of what it was. I was only 20 and I had an original 68 SS427 L72 Impala prepped by Motion Performance of NY. 4 speed with 4:10 gears. ...........I can't even write anymore here, I gotta throw up!
Was that Imp grecian green with black interior? http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r...ps89500e79.jpg </div></div> |
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Donnie</div><div class="ubbcode-body">heres my junker!
That car is tight !!!!! https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...2zowgrl_fs.jpg </div></div> |
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: XXXBlackLs6M22</div><div class="ubbcode-body">YeeHaa </div></div>
Nailed it with those pics. |
Re: Is "stance" important?
few shots of my 70 L-78 Nova,2001 camaro. Also for you truck fans a few of mine (except the dodge) Enjoy.
https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...5-dsc00865.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...7-dsc00872.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...9-dsc01796.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...0-dsc00862.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...1-img00072.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...3-dsc00889.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...4-dsc00881.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Z15 SS 454</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ss427copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This one I kick myself in the ass every time I think of what it was. I was only 20 and I had an original 68 SS427 L72 Impala prepped by Motion Performance of NY. 4 speed with 4:10 gears. ...........I can't even write anymore here, I gotta throw up!
Was that Imp grecian green with black interior? http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r...ps89500e79.jpg </div></div> </div></div> Like greenish silver and black int. know where it is??? |
Re: Is "stance" important?
Here ya go!! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/hmmm.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/burnout.gif[/img]
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...ps0185d329.jpg Tommy [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/3gears.gif[/img] |
Re: Is "stance" important?
You've seen this Chevelle recently on another thread, but here's my '69 post sedan SS day-two survivor sitting on 15x7 torque thrusts...
http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/g...ps86ad87a8.jpg http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/g...ps8ae9dd11.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/worship.gif[/img] It needs a Blackhawks decal on that bumper [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/naughty.gif[/img]
Dan |
Re: Is "stance" important?
Nice Helmut!!! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Here is my latest. Real deal '70 SS. It landed in Australia last week.
I love the stock height look of this car. http://i1216.photobucket.com/albums/...ps04da7cf3.png |
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Damien</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Here is my latest. Real deal '70 SS. It landed in Australia last week.
I love the stock height look of this car. http://i1216.photobucket.com/albums/...ps04da7cf3.png </div></div> Absolutely perfect. An iconic automobile.. |
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: day2killa</div><div class="ubbcode-body">1969 must have been a great year, of course I was conceived that year, but there must be more pics of 69 chevelles and camaros on this thread than any other car or year. </div></div>
Music to my ears. Ryan https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...5-8957ac90.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...6-899eef40.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...0pefq48_20.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...gq2hg48_20.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...hm6ir48_20.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...70_low_res.jpg https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...76_low_res.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
5 Attachment(s)
70 Chevelle SS had one of the nicest stances from the factory.
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
These next 2 photos are of the same car, and me, first one in 1979, and the next is last year. I sold the car in 1991 and lost track of it. The current owner is a local guy, and he's painted it and removed the vinyl top. It now has a 427 in it.
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...ars/Mein79.jpg http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...ly52011134.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
John,
Great pics, thanks for sharing [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img] Dan |
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
As soon as the snow goes away and the salt is off the road in Wiscy I'll pop some 69 pics up...
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
get that bad boy out and use it like it was meant to be used! See if all that "vintage" Day-2 stuff still works like it should Freddy.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.