Re: Is "stance" important?
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 442w30</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That Pride of America car is gawdawful. </div></div>


There used to be a common phrase on this site... &quot;he gets it&quot;, obviously you don't Diego. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/thumbsdown.gif[/img]

I find your remark offensive considering what that car represents. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/flag.gif[/img]

check this out

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 442w30</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ss427copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
<span style="color: #FF0000">Wow......really????</span>
</div></div>

Its intended purpose is exclusive to the fact that it's not my style. </div></div>


A lot of cars on this site are not my style, but I don't voice my opinion. Why and the world would you say that about the American pride Camaro?

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Astock</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
A lot of cars on this site are not my style, but I don't voice my opinion. Why and the world would you say that about the American pride Camaro? </div></div>

Oh, you're the Thought Police? [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img] So what if it's a patriotic paint job - does that automatically make it a Renoir? I don't get teary-eyed by random images of patriotism, and my opinion on an uninteresting paint job doesn't determine my level of patriotism either - it is silly!

Let's keep the thread on track, shall we?

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

Speaking of Random and Uninteresting........

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

WOW Vince..as everyone else has said this car just &quot;reeks&quot; (in a good way) the late 1970's look and stance...very clean car..<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: vince</div><div class="ubbcode-body">


https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...5-dscn2199.jpg


</div></div>

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

This is from about 1979 at the E-Town Car Show. This is stock ride height with optional HD front coils and 15&quot; ET mags.

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j3...ps210a2506.jpg

Before the mags, 1962
http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j3.../DSC03048a.jpg

I kinda like it with the nose up, but there's no engine in it now.....
http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j3...FoutsideLH.jpg
Verne [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

Ahhhh......the '62. This iconic Chevy has a stance of its own. Classic car.

http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r...ps3981e840.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

<span style="font-size: 23pt"> Verne.......... [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/shocked.gif[/img] </span> [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/worship.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/worship.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/worship.gif[/img]

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

[quote=whitetop]WOW Vince..as everyone else has said this car just &quot;reeks&quot; (in a good way) the late 1970's look and stance...very clean car..[quote=vince]


thank you for the compliment whitetop.

verne frantze those pics and that car are the tits....love that car.

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

Verne... love the 1979 look! More people need to run the pinstripe whitewall tires instead of the more common redlines and white letters.

Actually, all three looks are really cool! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/smile.gif[/img]