Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

You're right Mark,quality control needed to have someone looking over their shoulder as well,..there's no "CHEVELLE" grille emblem on the 26 mile LS-6 either.
Exterior ornaments are one thing,but you would hope they would've crossed their T's & dotted their I's when it came to brass tax items like the CON VIN stampings.

Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

It was actually a Thursday car, It should be an 03B car and probably has an LA W/O number somewhere near I520. Started down the line on 3/13/69 late afternoon, probably hit the GM assembly area (where the VIN would have been stamped on the body on Monday 3/17) and the engine area (body drop) on Tuesday 3/18. So the engine and transmission would have been stamped either late Monday or sometime Tuesday.

Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

03B car. Block is cast B 18 9

Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

Mark what do you meen Buy a workorder Number [ QUOTE ]
It was actually a Thursday car, It should be an 03B car and probably has an LA W/O number somewhere near I520. Started down the line on 3/13/69 late afternoon, probably hit the GM assembly area (where the VIN would have been stamped on the body on Monday 3/17) and the engine area (body drop) on Tuesday 3/18. So the engine and transmission would have been stamped either late Monday or sometime Tuesday.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

LA built cars have a w/o number stamped on the lower right corner of the trim tag that consists of a letter and three digits like I520. It is how LA kept track of car bodies inside the plant. The letter is equivalent to the bay the body was scheduled to be built and roughly corresponds to the day of the month in this case I = the 9th working day of the month, and the digits equal the 520th body scheduled to be built on that day. Note that the build day letter does not always correspond with the calendar day, ie the A build day is not always the first working day of the month.

Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

trim tag from same car https://www.yenko.net/attachments/194622-DSC02229.jpg

Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

Weren't making many Camaros on that day, I've got a trim tag from a Pacecar 34 VINs later with a I605 W/O number.

Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

How about anything prior to I125 in an 03B? https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/dunno.gif Anything else occur alike this in that week?

Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

That statement wasn't meant to be taken literally. LA built 3 different Chevrolet models (I think) and about 650 to 700 cars a day, so one would expect about every third W/O number to be a Camaro. But nothing says the bodies had to be spaced evenly throughout the day. The first 100 bodies of the day could have been all Camaros, or all Impalas, or whatever, they could have been scheduled to be made in batches or single units, you would have to follow the W/O numbers on the other models to know how they were distributed on any given day.

Re: Engine stamping...comments ?
 

Ahhh, now THAT makes more sense to me!

Based upon my knowledge , in theory, there would "APPEAR" to be hundreds of Camaros rolling off if you went by that!
I state that as when I did the math and the compared the #s and VIN's , for VN in that time, that would have this.
So there could be thought that 200-250 Camaros built per day?

To me that seems a bit high if you go by the # of units made in total, included in that total would be the Norwood cars for the whole years' totals!

Wouldnt it be more correct to state that there were about 100 Camaros built each day at each plant, roughly giving about 350 cars a month, ending up around 17,200 per Plant for Camaro's?

Was there any VN cars that had a number(not the letter) greater than "Example": I599 ?
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/dunno.gif