The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Lounge (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=87)
-   -   Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=106743)

Mr. Chevy 09-28-2009 06:57 AM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
Thanks for the history lesson on the Sherman Tanks.. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...s/rolleyes.gif It was used as a figure of speech if you couldn't figure that one out.. Opinions are like you know whats.. Everyone has one and is entitled to it and thats fine.. You have not convinced me in the least bit that it's NOT staged... All steel 59 VS. plastic, fiberglass and foam in the front ends of new cars.... Irregardless of the "crumple zones" and other safety features, it's just not going to happen, Sorry!!!!!!

Here is the fork, I am done...... My .02 opinion!! https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/smirk.gif

Rich

njsteve 09-28-2009 04:00 PM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
The Sherman tank expose was done in jest. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...ins/tongue.gif

And yes, everyone has an opinion but my "opinion" is based on experience with automotive product liability law and engineering facts. Believe it or not, this kind of stuff comes up a lot in the real world.

So how did they stage it? Acid dip the entire front end? Remove all the internal bracing and bolts? Computer generate the whole thing?


Oh, and those early design forks can be really dangerous. That's why they invented the Spork, so those unfortunate few that lost an eye in those early fork accidents could be protected. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif

Stick a Spork in it. I'm out. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...ns/burnout.gif

The Dude 09-28-2009 04:12 PM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
Under the hood of a 59.

http://i.ebayimg.com/14/!B,-rCwwBGk~...ugJ7sg~~_3.JPG

Notice there nothing in the area behind the core support, where the impact in the test occurred. Having picked up a flimsy sheet metal fender I know how much strengh they have. So all that Impala has is a stamped core support and a pontoon fender to absorb an impact.

king_midas 09-28-2009 05:06 PM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
The even sadder part of this is that GM built cars in the same fashion as the '59 all the way to 1988...

Mr. Chevy 09-28-2009 06:00 PM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
[ QUOTE ]
The Sherman tank expose was done in jest. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...ins/tongue.gif

And yes, everyone has an opinion but my "opinion" is based on experience with automotive product liability law and engineering facts. Believe it or not, this kind of stuff comes up a lot in the real world.

So how did they stage it? Acid dip the entire front end? Remove all the internal bracing and bolts? Computer generate the whole thing?


Oh, and those early design forks can be really dangerous. That's why they invented the Spork, so those unfortunate few that lost an eye in those early fork accidents could be protected. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif

Stick a Spork in it. I'm out. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...ns/burnout.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

WHATEVER https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...s/rolleyes.gif https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/laugh.gif

Rich

Kim_Howie 09-28-2009 06:14 PM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
O.K. You just stated "flimsy sheet metal fender" Maybe you need to check the 09 vs the 59 fenders thickness. The 59 crumpled way too easy, in my opinon. There is more metal in the inter fender well of the 59 compared to both fenders in 09.

hep1966 09-28-2009 06:33 PM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
I’m going to sit back and wait for a crash test between a 1909 and a 2009. I’m sure the thicker metal on the 1909 makes a safer car……

Verne_Frantz 09-28-2009 06:47 PM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
I've watched the video several times and I am amazed that the Malibu was able to penetrate the cowl of the '59, pulling down the A pillar, ejecting the door and buckling up the floor as it did. I'm not saying the test was rigged, but that huge cloud of rust dust does tell me something. The structural integrity of the '59s frame, lower cowl, rockers and floor were compromised before the impact. The Biscayne also appears to be a 6cyl, in which case the impact would have missed the motor completely. I think the results would have been quite different if the '59 had been a V8 car with a solid body & frame.

Verne https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/wink.gif

The Dude 09-28-2009 07:08 PM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
Pic from back in the day, when these cars were NOT rusted. A 59 hitting another 59. So much for the compromised integrity argument.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3451/...984ecdc3f7.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2593/...b7babd98cb.jpg

Kim_Howie 09-28-2009 07:24 PM

Re: Crash Test 59 Chevy vs New Malibu
 
The speed limit was 70mph back then, I doubt if both cars were doing 40mph as in the test.JMO


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.