![]() |
Quote:
|
Where's that car today, Bill? I bet it was fun. My roommate in college had a 1973 RS Z28 and I thought it was a rocket ship, but it may have become faster in my memory over the past 45 years.
|
You could wake them up pretty good just by rejetting the Qjet. The factory jetted them pretty lean trying to get a grip on emissions. With headers and a good tune they were pretty good. Not an LT-1, but really just an L-46 with 2 points less compression.
|
The 73 Z28 engine had most of the same parts as the earlier Z28 engines. It is a pretty neat engine. It is considered a high rpm small block.
|
Sorry didn't mean to confuse anyone one. The interior picture is my 73 Z28 that I am restoring, I was curious what shift knob is in the OPs 7K mile 73.
Sorry for jumping the gun. Looking forward to pictures and info about this car. Nice car. I have a 16k mile ‘73 RS Z. |
Quote:
I posted about this car way back on this site trying to find it and to see if anyone remembered "Bit of Gold" but had no replies. Bill |
Bill, if your friend was used to driving a 69 with an L88 I'm sure the 73 did feel like a slug! I traded in a 70 Z on a new 73 Z and didn't feel there was too much difference between the two in normal street performance.
|
Boy I did. When I was a kid I had them both at the same time. Both cars were hot runners. My description of the street feel below and as a comparison and I am tossing out the soft Vega seats that gave you that G force feel as you sank into them when you got on it.
0-60 The 1970 just pulled way harder then the 73. 60-80 MPH both pulled about the same. 80 and up -- all LT-1 and its not even close. 1973 was boy racer loud with the open element air cleaner though. 1973 had superior handling with the Wide 60 Ovals. |
A 73 Z with a good Dyno tune and a little Dist work and headers
will take out just about anything! that engine is super strong. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.