Re: 1969 Camaro the last convertible
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Charley Lillard</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Saying &quot;vin#&quot; is saying &quot;Vehicle identification number number&quot; The # is not needed. </div></div>

Yes you are right... Everybody here likely knows what VIN means.

I used it in context the same way as historically GM used it (#) as an identifier for the dealers or alternately called it the &quot;serial number&quot; at the assembly level.

Re: 1969 Camaro the last convertible
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt S</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The VIN for the car is 124679N675217 - 08D car. Discredits a nice car with a stupid claim. </div></div>

Agreed.
Just let the car be what it is, and let it sell on its own merits.
It's not like you're buying Jon Voight's LeBaron, right?

And I also agree on the vin terminology. It is one of my pet peeves to refer to the &quot;vehicle identification numer number&quot;.

Re: 1969 Camaro the last convertible
 

Not sure how that's relevant here. That's relevant within a day, not months.
O8D is nowhere near the end of production.