Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

I agree the blue LS6 went for more than the Motion vette, that seems odd...

Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

Wasn't the 68 Motion Vette the one TRM was trying to sell sometime ago?

Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

yes. Owner is Dave Belk

Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

Another car that blew me away was $510K for a shelby recreation.

Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

Speaking of odd....

#396 - 1967 Chevelle SS convertible for $132,300

Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

[ QUOTE ]
Another car that blew me away was $510K for a shelby recreation.

[/ QUOTE ]Came to $553K with the 8% Buyer Premium but hey, Who's counting when you get into them digits?? I bet Charley's Real Super Snake would pull a Million at next years Scottsdale event!

Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

Big difference is I believe Charley has all the DOCs to prove what it is!!!!!

I think the difference in the sales of the cars,was how they were promoted prior to the sale and again the paperwork for them.

How did the 68 L89 Vette #416 do? I see Jim had the Tank Sticker for the 68 L89 car showng the L89 option at the center top of the sticker https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/smile.gif

Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

There was a 69 red Vette that was a supposed L89 but no paperwork talked about that only brought 49K.
As for the GT500E that sold for 510K... There was mention of some of the proceeds going to charity. It is a current car built by Unique Performance that probably has a MSRP of 130K. The bidders were both phone bidders. If I were Unique, what better way to pump up the value of my other cars is there than to show the world that one sells for 510K. I'm not saying that is what happened but who in their right mind would pay that kind of money for a 68 Mustang that has been built into a Shelby ?

Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

If it was actually for sale, It would probably pull in the hemi cuda convertible range.

Re: Barrett Jackson Palm Beach
 

I did not see this 67 SS Conv., is there photos of this car to be seen?? Was it an L-78, can't imagine any other reason a 67 SS Conv. would take that money.

Mike