Actually one pic is when the repop tag was first put on and not painted, then the second pic of the same tag painted and sanded.

Seller just posted a nonsense explanation of the discrepancies. He is a dealer, not the owner. Not sure if he is aware the owner knows of the challenges. Bid is only at $50k.

That car is a train wreck.

Sellers experts saying that tag is real is a joke. Another guy wanted to comment about the block being possible and using the color as a hold up. With that tag we have no idea what color that car originally was. You did a good job in the discussion Lynn

The BaT discussion regarding this car is kinda like arguing about whether or not a female impersonator has breast implants.

69 Camaro...
 

Great analogy...let's move on to the real cars or breasts :cool2:

Bid to 67500.00. Maybe people are catching on! Highly unlikely
Doc

Yeah, this black clone got called out heavily and it definitely kept it in clone price range but a dusk blue 69Z VIN 124379N633240 without any original drive train at all sold a couple of weeks ago on Bat for $111,969 https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19...maro-z-28-167/ So I wouldn't count to much on anything changing on that site from the sellers or buyers.
And to think that same buyer could have a had an original lemans blue, real deal, beautiful, survivor from right here on Yenko.net. for the same money! https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=176167 These Bat buyers do no research or homework at all!!

I think they were trying for LeMans Blue but the shade they achieved is one of the things I did not like about that car. I was really surprised at the result. BAT does seem to attract some buyers that are not too familiar with Camaros. The seller of the black one (not the owner) did a horrible job representing that car. The owner seems to want to dump it on someone else.

If you read the threads on the camaro sites, you know the owner is aware of the issues.