The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Technical & Restoration (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=86)
-   -   Camaro rearend decoding (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=139917)

ssl78 11-06-2016 09:41 PM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
Does it have multi leaf or mono leaf perches. I do not see the mount for the 67 traction bar

cook_dw 11-06-2016 10:53 PM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
Can you post a pic of the axle tubes going into the center section? BTW Im not a fan of the stamping but I could be wrong at this point..

Kurt S 11-07-2016 06:57 AM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
Looks like a 67 axle. Should have monoleaf perches.
Is there evidence a radius rod bracket was attached? http://www.camaros.org/radiusrod.shtml

Fast67VelleN2O 11-07-2016 01:02 PM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ssl78</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Does it have multi leaf or mono leaf perches. I do not see the mount for the 67 traction bar </div></div>

It's an October of 1966 rear end. 1967 did not have the traction bar at that point yet.

rafbody 11-07-2016 01:15 PM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Fast67VelleN2O</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ssl78</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Does it have multi leaf or mono leaf perches. I do not see the mount for the 67 traction bar </div></div>

It's an October of 1966 rear end. 1967 did not have the traction bar at that point yet. </div></div>

If the stamped assembly date is correct it is a January 1967 assembled rear end and should have had the bracket for the rod.

Fast67VelleN2O 11-07-2016 02:52 PM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: rafbody</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

If the stamped assembly date is correct it is a January 1967 assembled rear end and should have had the bracket for the rod. </div></div>

Were the perches and brackets added to the housing during assembly when the assembly was stamped? I would assume that wasn't the case.

Blownrsz 11-08-2016 01:04 PM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
It does not have the bracket for the traction bar. I'll get pics of the the spring mounts.

Kurt S 11-08-2016 02:22 PM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
By that date, a 4.10 axle should have a bracket.

Blownrsz 11-09-2016 12:15 AM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
Here are the axle tubes and the spring mounts https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics...2-img_5152.jpg
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics...3-img_5153.jpg

Blownrsz 11-09-2016 12:17 AM

Re: Camaro rearend decoding
 
After a lot closer inspection it looks like the traction bar bracket had been removed.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.