Re: Opinions on 1100837 Alternator Stamping
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SuperNovaSS</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> It's too bad all the restamps aren't terrible. </div></div>

Wow, I guess so.....I certainly would have been fooled by the one you pictured, Jason.

Re: Opinions on 1100837 Alternator Stamping
 

First one pictured isn't roll stamped - although there is a roll stamp re-stamper out there

Re: Opinions on 1100837 Alternator Stamping
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: m22mike</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nice [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img] </div></div>

Thanks Mike!

Re: Opinions on 1100837 Alternator Stamping
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bergy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">First one pictured isn't roll stamped - </div></div>

That was my impression as well.

The 2's also do not have the vertical straight leg off the bottom.
The 2 in the 12V was beat up and re-stamped so they wouldn't be different.

Re: Opinions on 1100837 Alternator Stamping
 

Re-stamp for sure.

Re: Opinions on 1100837 Alternator Stamping
 

Jason, both the 2 and the 7 is a different font.

http://i630.photobucket.com/albums/u...psx8cvktk9.jpg

Re: Opinions on 1100837 Alternator Stamping
 

I agree. The 3s are different too. The upper and lower legs extend further out from the center on the original.


Thanks again for all the replies,

Jason

Re: Opinions on 1100837 Alternator Stamping
 

what i saw first was the 3s and 7s..then the K was weird..but i havent seen many to be able to say anything..and know its confirmed...


boy..they are getting better...arent they??