Re: ok, isn't this w30 cheap?
 

I agree with Stefano, that car's a bit rough & needs lots of details corrected. Those stripes are really bad.

People should at least try........

I think the bench seat is cool! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/smile.gif[/img]

Joe

Re: ok, isn't this w30 cheap?
 

Does anyone have an accurate number on 4 speed cars in 72?

Re: ok, isn't this w30 cheap?
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Future Stock</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Does anyone have an accurate number on 4 speed cars in 72? </div></div>

It was 289 4 speeds, and I think 33 4 speed convertibles.

The 4 speed W30s are a fun car to drive.

John

Re: ok, isn't this w30 cheap?
 

I have owned all year w-30s. Drove my 72 w-30 convt. 4 speed as my daily driver for more that 5 years in the 90s. My old 72 sold recently out of the Milt Robson collection for well under $100k a one of 33 documented car. So as we all know rare does not make expensive. The 72 just doesn't have the following of the 70 and 71 cars. Many believe the blacked grilles in 71 were much nicer but 70 is the year to own with some of the early w-30s in high demand if they are documented. One would think with so many made up w-30 cars (not born with the option) 72 would be highly sought after because of the x in the vin designating a real w-30. That said I also follow the auction and other sales prices for these cars and nice 72 w-30 have had poor auction showings. Lee

Re: ok, isn't this w30 cheap?
 

a gold 71 auto W-30 sold out of milwaukee last year for less than 25K

it was a real nice car,too.

Re: ok, isn't this w30 cheap?
 

stephano,

So the protecto plate on a 72 olds does not show in anyway, shape or form, its a w30?

-bob

Re: ok, isn't this w30 cheap?
 

If the POP shows the VIN, then it'll show it's a W-30 due to the engine code.

Re: ok, isn't this w30 cheap?
 

An X in the VIN is W30 and only W30 (unless it's a HO Cutlass Supreme Indy Pace Car).